Archangel1313

joined 1 month ago
[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

They spelled "terrorism" wrong.

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 3 points 2 hours ago

It isn't just "business". This is Elon Musk expanding his personal control over global communications networks. This is the worst thing we could be allowing to happen. He cannot be trusted with the ability to simply shut down internet access wherever he feels his interests are not being prioritized.

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 8 points 2 hours ago

I think Canadians are envious of the film A Bridge Too Far, which highlights Americans and the Brits and the exploits that they made in the Netherlands.

These fucks came into the war at the end, and think they sacrificed the most. Canadians were there all along and liberated most of the country before the US even got around to pulling their heads out of their asses.

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 22 points 23 hours ago

This is the definition of ethnic cleansing.

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

Socialism had been a major part of my family going back to WW2, when my grandfather fought Nazis in Norway. He raised my father on Socialist principles, and my father raised me on them.

What else would you call that?

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 15 points 1 day ago

She's a fucking sellout and a traitor.

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

This is essentially what the liberal judges are wondering too. Trump's lawyers seem to be arguing that the default should be to suspend people's due process rights, instead of accepting the burden of having to prove their case against each person.

This creates a system where instead of the government protecting people's rights...the people are obligated to defend their rights from the government.

It's a terrifying outcome, but that appears to be where the Trump administration is heading with all this. You are guilty until proven innocent, and no one is obligated to provide proof of your guilt, in order to pass sentence on you. It's up to you to prove your innocence....which any lawyer with half a degree will tell you, is impossible. You can't provide evidence for something that doesn't exist.

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 14 points 1 day ago

At this point, it wouldn't surprise me if he ruled against interracial marriage.

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

Yes. Because we only want the strongest, most brutal AI to be left. We deserve whatever we get from the results.

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don't understand why. He's out there, doing everything he said he would. His supporters are getting exactly what they voted for.

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He should have worn a suit to that meeting, and said "thank you".

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago

What a scamp.

view more: next ›