this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
36 points (95.0% liked)

politics

23509 readers
2522 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A new humanitarian organization that has U.S. backing to take over aid delivery to starving civilians in Gaza said Wednesday that it expects to begin operations before the end of the month — after what it describes as key agreements from Israeli officials.

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Here's hoping they can do something. But a "key agreement with Israeli officials" isn't worth a lick.

[–] catenavi@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I agree. I'm optimistic, but very cautiously so.

American reporting says the organization has US-backing and Israelis agreed to it. It also says the organization is failing to explain their ability to adhere to humanitarian laws or how involved both governments will be.

Israeli reporting says it will be multiple civilian-ran aid stations spread around Gaza, each responsible for about 300k people, with IDF "overseeing it from a distance."

Another new source (I believe it was Palestinian, but I'd have to double check) says it involved an agreement between the US and Hamas, which they believe to be a signal the US will be changing how it navigates the complex political climate of the region.

The only consistency between the reporting seems to be: there is a new organization, they do intend to provide food and medicine, all parties agreed to this though to what extent is unknown, and Israel isn't thrilled. When you keep in mind Israel just killed another 80 people after these talks, it's pretty rational, I think, to be hopeful they get aid, but assume it will end, at the risk of sounding crass, with civilians being target practice for the IDF after they make up a fictional attack.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 3 hours ago

If it has US backing, that means Trump administration backing. And that, in turn, means they're not going to do anything to help the Palestinians. Just some window-dressing to deflect attention from US involvement in the genocide.