this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
205 points (99.0% liked)

politics

23493 readers
3018 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dryfter@lemm.ee 10 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

http://www.kff.org/tracking-the-medicaid-provisions-in-the-2025-budget-bill/

• Requires states to conduct eligibility redeterminations at least every 6 months for Medicaid expansion adults.

I'm on Medicaid currently because I'm on SSDI. I have to recertify my eligibility every year. It takes the local office 4-5 months to make the determination. A LOT of people are going to get left behind if this happens. Local offices will never be able to keep up and people are going to lose coverage.

Those of us on the bottom of society that have to utilize the safety net already had to go through hell to get approved in the first place in most cases. These assholes lack empathy completely because they've never had to utilize the safety net and think we're lying or something about needing it.

If you're in the U.S. and have never needed any kind of government assistance, let me clarify the process a bit:

  • Imagine you're on a plane and you have to jump out with a parachute to get to safety. That's scary.
  • Just before you jump, you're told you have to charge up the parachute release by free falling through rings in the sky. That are on fire.
  • You make it through all the rings of fiery death and your parachute doesn't open because it didn't charge up the release for some reason (why would it, in what world does it make sense to have to do that?)
  • As you're falling you see what looks to be like a bouncy house on the ground. Lucky for you there's a safety net halfway between you and the ground.
  • The safety net has a tiny tear in it and as you fall into the net the tear becomes a split down the entire net and you continue falling.
  • Bracing for impact into the bouncy house you can see it's starting to sag a little. Is it leaking air? Will you make it in time before the air is completely out?
  • The bouncy house had enough air to keep you safe thankfully and you never touch the ground until the air completely deflates from the bouncy house.
  • Oh but wait....you've been on solid ground for a year? Nope, you're going to repeat the process only this time instead of a bunch of rings of fire you only have to go through one. But there's no safety net....and no parachute. Just the ring of fire and the slowly leaking bouncy house on the "ground".

They're not taking Medicaid away, they're just purposefully making it harder to keep it. So technically they didn't "cut" Medicaid. Because, after all, Trump didn't lie when he said Medicaid and Social Security were off the table, right?

[–] madeinthebackseat@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

I can promise you they know they're being cruel.

The supposed savings come from when people like you die sooner.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 13 points 18 hours ago

Repubs: "Stop saying we're cutting Medicaid! We're not cutting Medicaid! So relax! We're just changing the rules so that no one will be eligible for it any more."

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 17 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

That number wouldn't cover the tax cuts for the rich and it's over a decade. POS republicans.

The fiscal centerpiece of the “big, beautiful bill” now making its way through Congress is to take Medicaid away from jobless adults. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the work requirement would save $300 billion over a decade and take health insurance from 7.6 million people. This would not come close to offsetting the deficit-exploding effects of extending and expanding the 2017 tax cut, but it’s one of the only big spending reductions the congressional Republican caucus can agree on.

[–] sndmn@lemmy.ca 10 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

They have to find money to aid the genocide in Gaza.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world -4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Just like Germany, who sells Israel weapons.

[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Bruh, I know (as in an acquaintance, not someone I'm friends with) a "middle class" family which the parents are talking about not giving any inheritance to one of their children because he has mental health issues, the parent's reasoning being because "they will get welfare anyways" and that "its a waste to give wealth to someone that can't even appreciate it".

Like wow, its crazy how people actually have this ableist idea that people who get welfare are somehow "lucky".

Bitch that shit aint even enough to survive, I know its legally within their rights, but jesus christ, how cold hearted could you be.

But I don't know them well enough to confront them, and I don't think I'm in the right to confront them as an outsider. Oh well, I hope the kid grows up the hate the parents.

Edit: I think this is probably the same thought process the 1% rich also have. Like Elon and his Trans kid that Elon hates for some bigoted reason.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 4 points 19 hours ago

Mother fuckers